Path: santra!tut!draken!kth!mcvax!uunet!shelby!apple!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!wasatch!donn
From: donn@wasatch.utah.edu (Donn Seeley)
Newsgroups: alt.fusion
Subject: members of the DOE committee visit Pons's lab
Summary: and local metallurgists report results; legal fees for patent defense
Message-ID: <1982@wasatch.utah.edu>
Date: 3 Jun 89 02:21:35 GMT
Organization: University of Utah CS Dept
Lines: 130

We were cut off from alt.fusion for a couple days due to a lightning
strike at the University of Michigan...  Apparently we don't get alt.*
or gnu.* from our other backbone feed, the University of Texas; perhaps
they don't get these groups?  Too bad.

There still isn't much new technical information to report, but there
have been some curious political developments.  The most startling news
is that members of the DOE committee actually visited Pons's lab today,
in spite of the fact that Pons earlier stated that he wasn't interested
in meeting them because he thought they were hopelessly biased.
Yesterday's Daily Utah Chronicle (the student newspaper) reported:

	Following an earlier postponement, a Department of Energy panel
	studying cold fusion will visit the University of Utah
	chemistry lab of B Stanley Pons Friday.

	U Vice President for Research James Brophy said the five
	scientists from the 20-member panel will be on campus Friday
	morning to see the cold-fusion experiment firsthand and to
	talk with several U scientists.  ...

	The panel was originally scheduled to visit Wednesday, but
	Pons objected to the negatively biased makeup of the panel
	and said he would not allow panel members in his lab
	until the bias was balanced out by either replacing the
	disbelieving scientists or adding more cold-fusion
	believers.  ...

Today's (6/2) Chronnie gave a partial agenda:

	...  The DOE panel ... is scheduled to arrive Friday morning
	and depart by 2 p.m.  ...

	In the morning, the panel will visit Pons' laboratory along
	with U chemists Cheves Walling and John Simons.  ...

	... [T]he panel will [then] have a 'working lunch' with Milton
	Wadsworth, U dean of the College of Mines and Minerals, and
	several of his colleagues.  ...

The 6 o'clock news on channel 2 had a brief report on the visit.  None
of the committee members were interviewed and the committee briefing
was closed to reporters, but Pons came out to chat with reporters
later.  He said that his group is now 99+% confident that they are
observing fusion; they are now seeing substantial sustained bursts of
energy in some experiments, apparently including one which amounted to
50x input continuously for about 2 days.  Pons thinks that a small
demonstration power plant may be ready pretty soon -- 'we know what to
do to get power out,' he said, and he believes that the local
metallurgists have the key to speeding up the practical device process.

The U metallurgists have been very forthcoming over the last couple
days.  They apparently have at least one working cell, and already have
some preliminary results, according to the 6/1 Chronnie:

	...  Sivaraman Guruswamy, a U metallurgy professor who has been
	trying to duplicate the fusion experiment using electrodes
	other than palladium, said ... he has duplicated the
	Pons-Fleischmann experiment using a palladium electrode, but
	has been unable to duplicate it using other electrodes.

	Currently, Guruswamy said he has had an electrochemical cell
	generating heat since May 21, albeit inconsistently.  The cell
	has been giving off heat in spurts, he explained, and during
	one 90-minute spurt, 54 watts were being produced for every
	nine watts put in.  ...

There were more details in the 6/2 edition:

	...  Guruswamy has [seen] at least four 'very random bursts of
	heat' between 10 watts and 60 watts.

	...  Guruswamy's laboratory has yet to produce a sustained
	reaction on the scale of Pons and Fleischmann.

	After letting his experiment run for a few more days, Guruswamy
	will analyze the palladium cell for possible material changes.

	In addition to palladium, though, Guruswamy said he will also
	investigate 'at least four' other metals known to absorb
	hydrogen as possible cells for the experiment.

	Guruswamy said one possible metal to be investigated is
	zirconium, but would not reveal any others he is considering.

	Guruswamy added he will likely be working with U engineering
	professor Gary Sandquist and U physicist Michael Salamon in
	analyzing the cells.  ...

(Isn't Guruswamy a great name for a university professor? :-)

On the patent front, there were rumblings on the evening news that the
lawyers are turning out to be more expensive than expected.  Originally
the patent defense fund contained only twenty some odd thousand dollars
but some administrators feel that this is inadequate and there may be a
new legislative session called to allocate more money.  All this is
especially interesting given that the state's own fusion committee
still has not officially concluded that fusion was confirmed, as far as
I know.

The New York Times's Tuesday fusion-bashing did not go unnoticed here.
This afternoon's Deseret News reported some comments from the U on the
Santa Fe coverage:

	The international controversy surrounding the University of
	Utah's cold-fusion claims has, unfortunately, divided the news
	reporters into two camps -- supporters and non-supporters, two
	U public relations directors contend.

	'Depending on which newspaper you read, you would believe
	fusion is dead or still going strong,' U news director Pamela
	Fogle told a Salt Lake communications conference Thursday.

	As examples of bias in reporting, Fogle cited two recent
	headlines taken from newspapers reporting on the same event --
	the May 24 Santa Fe, NM, conference on fusion:

	'Conference on Fusion Told of Failure,' stated the New York
	Times headline.  Conversely, Fogle said, the Wall Street
	Journal told readers that a 'Texas Group Reports More Signs of
	Cold Fusion at US Meeting.'

	Fogle and her colleague, science writer Barbara Shelley, said
	they have observed, as the fusion story has unfolded, that the
	West Coast media are more supportive than East Coast press.  ...

But are West Coast Usenet sites more supportive than the East Coast ones,

Donn Seeley    University of Utah CS Dept    donn@cs.utah.edu
40 46' 6"N 111 50' 34"W    (801) 581-5668    utah-cs!donn