Newsgroups: rec.arts.int-fiction
Path: gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!library.ucla.edu!csulb.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!intrepid
From: intrepid@netcom.com (Intrepid Traveller)
Subject: Re: Young whippersnappers?
Message-ID: <intrepidCLpy6n.3DI@netcom.com>
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest)
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
References: <2kg3su$ibl@agate.berkeley.edu> <JKH.94Feb23235710@whisker.hubbard.ie>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 1994 07:59:10 GMT
Lines: 11

  Hmmm, I dunno, I am currently employed at Activision, in the Infocom games
division and I'm currently helping program the mac cd-rom version of the 
game.  I have to admit that nothing will ever compare to the original 
infocom games, they were the best.  Newer games are like movies of books,
the book is always better, because it left things up to your imagination,
but I try not to compare games such as Return to Zork to the original, as
they are not the same.  Return to Zork is not even close to the original
Zork, and is not meant to be, in my mind it is to be seen as an independent
game that should be seen as such, not as a sequel to Zork.  Anyhow, that's
my two cents, enough rambling for today before I go off to bed.

